|
|
© 2006-2007
by Sarah Beach. All Rights Reserved. No part of this article may be reproduced
without permission. ScribblerWorks and the ScribblerWorks logo are trademarks
(TM) of Sarah L. Beach 2007
MYTHOPOESIS: Heroes
& Heroines
(first published in
Mythlore 43, Autumn 1985; revised 2007)
Down the ages there
have been two important Types of characters in storytelling: heroes and
heroines. The Hero was the character the storyline followed, relating
his trials and victories. The Heroine was the character the Hero loved,
won, and came home to. Joseph Campbell in The Hero With a Thousand
Faces (Princeton University Press: 1973) explicates what he calls
the "monomyth" of the Hero, the pattern of the Hero's quest
and the type of events which he encounters. Much, indeed, has been written
on Heroes. Much less has been said about Heroines. Ralph Tymns in The
Double in Literature (Bowes & Bowes: 1949) makes these observations
of two Types of the Heroine:
The blue-eye, fair-haired,
light complexioned one is the Fair Maiden, alias the Persecuted Maiden,
the Virgin, the Saint, the Pale Lady, the Good Woman, the Nice Girl, the
Marriageable Young Lady. Her darker counterpart is the Femme Fatale, alias
the Temptress, the Vamp, the Sinner, the Dark Lady, the Bad Woman, the
Naughty Girl, the Trollop. Sometimes she is called Mistress or Prostitute
or Even or Whore of Babylon, depending on circumstances. (DL, p. 126)
This is, of course,
an extreme and simple analysis of the two Types of Heroine, for both have
positive and negative presentations. Additionally the Heroine can appear
in the three-form possibilities of Maiden, Matron and Hag. So often, for
the Storyteller, the Heroine serves to depict some element or quality
the Hero needs to deal with. Indeed, Maud Bodkin observes in Archetypal
Patterns in Poetry (Oxford University Press: 1963) that
It is in the process
of fantasy that the contemplated characters of things are broken from
their historical setting and made available to express the needs and impulses
of the experiencing mind. (APP, p. 7)
If the Sub-Creator
is using his Heroes and Heroines in order to examine the nature of something,
then perhaps the gender of the characters has little to do with their
function. Perhaps it is only tradition that sets the pattern.
If gender is not important
to the functions of Heroes and Heroines, what qualities are important?
Campbell calls his perception of the Hero a "monomyth", which
indicates a singular quality tot he function of the Hero, no matter what
personality is given the Hero. Campbell's study deals with the elements
of the Hero's quest and its progress. By this we can determine that the
Hero represents the quality of action. Using Tymns' observations, we can
begin to perceive the quality represented by the Heroine, a quality which
we might call the "essence". The Heroine usually represents
for the Hero the essences of love or wisdom or socialization.
The Hero's quest is
the quest of Self, and traditionally the Hero's union with the Heroine
at the end signified reintegration in Society. The Hero's quest springs
up in isolation, alienation and exile, and if in the story it is an isolation,
from Society, in the character it is an isolation from the Self. Campbell
observes
From the standpoint
of the way of duty, anyone in exile from the community is a nothing. From
the other point of view, however, this exile is the first step of the
quest. Each carries within himself the all; therefore it may be sought
and discovered within. The differentiations of sex, age, and occupation
are not essential to our character, but mere costumes which we wear for
a time on the stage of the world. The image of man within is not to be
confounded with the garments. (HTF, p. 385)
The Quest is an inner
one, and as Campbell points out, the form of its main character is merely
a costume for the Self.
It might be more helpful,
then, to call the two functions of the Quest the Quality of Action and
the Quality of Essence, rather than Hero and Heroine, for in recent years,
the force of tradition has been weakening. In many recent works, female
characters have been assuming the role of "hero", the quester,
the active character. Tradition does still hold sufficient sway to keep
the other reversal at a minimum: the part of the passive, "essential"
anchor is not yet often given to male characters.
What could be provoking
this change in the function assigned to female characters? It is not simply
the growing social consciousness of the equality of the sexes. By looking
at the nature of the quest and not its characters, we may find a key.
Could it be that alienation is so pervasive a factor in modern life that
resocialization is deemed irrelevant? Could it be that the quest for Self
takes all the importance of meaning in a story, and that therefore female
characters (who in addition to traditionally representing "essential"
qualities also often represent the sub-conscious) are better suited to
the modern quest mode? What ever the actual cause, any Sub-Creator would
do well to remember the functions of Hero and Heroine, whether the "Hero"
is masculine or feminine. Randal Helms, in Tolkien's World (Houghton
Mifflin: 1974) makes these observations of the handling of the Heroes
in modern works:
A hero is the expression
of a culture's ideals about itself, and our ideals about ourselves have
all been punctured. Cultural ideals are formulated and understood most
efficiently in myths, and we have lost the ability to participate wholeheartedly
in mythic belief, lost in fact the key to respond to our culture's central
mythic system.... Most contemporary heroic fantasy is vulgar and debasing
struggle against will, rescue of good but because those
themes are unsupported by a resonant image of man: they lack a vital superstructure
of ideas. (TW, p. 150)
In order to avoid
this hollow vulgarity, then, the Sub-Creator must remember that his Hero
and Heroine are not simply characters moving through events, but that
they are qualities that have meaning for his readers. Although few Authors
begin to form their story by focusing on meaning of what they wish to
say, they should not ignore it. The object of the Hero's quest
on the level of the story's (meaning), not its events is internal
growth, to achieve the spiritual balance which is often represented in
the figure of the Heroine. The Heroine serves to call the Hero onward
to the completion of the quest.
Admittedly, when one
is discussing Types in literature, the exceptions leap to mind, the characters
who do not precisely fit the pattern. There are the Heroines who are active
participants in the journey of the quest, not simply the reward waiting
at the end of the quest, not simply the reward waiting at the end of the
trials; there are the Fair and Dark Heroines who break their Type; the
Heroes who skip elements in the quest or who do not achieve self-awareness
and resocialization. But these are "made available to express
the needs and impulses of the experiencing mind" (APP, p. 7).
Campbell has this
to say of the meaning of the quest, unfractured by being separated into
Hero and Heroine:
The aim is not
to see, but to realize that one is, that essence; then one is free to
wander as that essence in the world. Furthermore; the world too is of
that essence. The essence of oneself and the essence of the world; these
two are one. Hence separateness, withdrawal, is no longer necessary. Wherever
the hero may wander, whatever he may do, he is ever in the presence of
his own essence for he has the perfected eye to see. There is no
separateness. Thus, just as the way of the social participation may lead
in the end to a realization of the All in the individual, so that of exile
brings the hero to the Self in all. (HTF, p. 386)
How the Author handles
his characters, the depth of recognition he shows as to (what) his characters
represent in the tale, can affect how honestly and freely he deals with
them in the telling of the story. The Author's understanding can give
the Hero and Heroine (for those who are filling their functions) the free
rein they need in order to achieve the quest. But a failure whether
conscious or sub-conscious to understand the Qualities of Hero
and Heroine will only cripple the characters. The stronger grasp an Author's
awareness has of this truth, the surer touch it will have in breathing
life into the questers, the Heroes and Heroines.
|